Since the two-pot retirement system launched in September 2024, one rule has been absolute: you cannot touch the retirement pot. Two-thirds of your new contributions go in, and they stay locked until you retire.
That rule might be about to change.
National Treasury confirmed last week that it's exploring allowing access to the retirement component for workers who've been retrenched and are in "severe financial distress." The discussions are expected to begin later this year, with Cosatu pushing for changes to take effect in 2027.
Here's what we know, what it means, and why you should pay attention whether you support the idea or not.
What's Actually Being Proposed?
National Treasury deputy director-general Chris Axelson clarified the intent during a parliamentary briefing: if someone has exhausted their savings pot, has no employment income, and has no UIF payments — but still has money in their retirement pot — they should be able to access some of it to survive.
ℹ️ Key Detail
This isn't about opening the retirement pot for everyone. It's being framed as emergency-only access for retrenched workers who've used up every other resource. Access would come with strict conditions and would likely be paid as a monthly amount, not a lump sum.
Cosatu's position goes further. They want retrenched workers to access all their savings — including the preservation component — once UIF and the savings pot are exhausted. Their proposal: pay it as a monthly annuity equal to the worker's former salary.
The Numbers So Far: R79.3 Billion Withdrawn
To understand why this debate matters, look at what's already happened with just the savings pot:
- R79.3 billion withdrawn from savings pots (September 2024 – February 2026)
- R21.4 billion in tax collected on those withdrawals
- 5.6 million South Africans applied for tax directives
That's R79 billion that won't compound for 20 or 30 years. The long-term cost to South Africa's retirement security runs into the hundreds of billions.
Now imagine opening the retirement pot too.
Two Very Different Views
The Case For (Cosatu's Position)
South Africa's unemployment rate sits above 32%. When someone loses their job, UIF pays out for a limited period (usually 6-12 months, depending on contributions). After that, if you've already used your savings pot, you're stuck.
Having R200,000 locked in a retirement pot while you can't feed your family or pay rent isn't theoretical — it's happening to real people right now. Cosatu argues the system should recognise this reality.
The Case Against (Industry's Position)
The Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (Asisa) is firmly opposed. Their view: allowing retirement pot access, even for retrenchment, will "erode preservation and result in even greater financial hardship at retirement."
The industry's concern isn't heartless — it's mathematical. If people access their retirement pot during working years, the compound growth that money would have generated disappears forever. They'll arrive at 65 with even less than the already-dire projections.
⚠️ South Africa's Retirement Crisis in One Stat
Only 6% of South Africans can maintain their standard of living when they retire. Opening the retirement pot could push that number even lower — but leaving people destitute now isn't the answer either.
What "Strict Conditions" Might Look Like
Treasury has signalled this won't be a free-for-all. Based on the Budget Review and parliamentary briefings, expect conditions like:
- Proof of retrenchment — voluntary resignation likely won't qualify
- UIF must be exhausted first — you'd need to use up all unemployment benefits before accessing the retirement pot
- Savings pot must be depleted — the existing withdrawal mechanism comes first
- No alternative income — documented proof that you have no other source of funds
- Percentage-based access — likely a percentage of your income rather than a lump sum, paid monthly
- Time-limited — probably not indefinite access, perhaps 6-12 months
The monthly annuity approach (paying out a salary-equivalent) is actually smart if implemented correctly. It prevents the lump-sum-disappears-in-a-month problem that we've seen with savings pot withdrawals.
How This Affects Your Retirement Planning
If You're Currently Employed
Don't change anything yet. This is a discussion, not legislation. Continue contributing to your retirement fund normally. The retirement pot remains locked for now, and any changes would take at least a year to implement.
What you should do: make sure you have an emergency fund outside your retirement savings. Three to six months of expenses in a money market or notice deposit account. If you lose your job, you want options that don't involve raiding your retirement.
If You've Already Withdrawn From Your Savings Pot
This year's savings pot contribution is building up as you earn. Don't withdraw again unless you genuinely need to. The research is clear: 80% of people who withdrew in year one plan to do it again. That pattern leads to arriving at retirement with almost nothing.
If You're Facing Retrenchment
Right now, the rules haven't changed. Your options remain:
- Savings pot: One withdrawal per tax year (you may have already used this for 2026/27)
- UIF: Apply immediately upon retrenchment
- Vested component: Accessible if you resign or are retrenched (old rules apply)
- Retirement pot: Still locked. If Treasury moves forward, access might open in 2027 at the earliest
💡 What You Can Do Now
Even without retirement pot access, retrenched workers can still access their vested component (pre-September 2024 savings) and their savings pot. Speak to your fund administrator about your specific balance in each component.
The Bigger Picture
This debate highlights a fundamental tension in South Africa's retirement system. We're trying to solve two problems that pull in opposite directions:
- People need money now — unemployment is high, inflation bites, and families are struggling
- People need money later — without forced preservation, almost nobody saves enough for retirement
The two-pot system was supposed to be the compromise: give people access to one-third (savings pot), lock away two-thirds (retirement pot). If we start unlocking the retirement pot too — even with conditions — we're shifting that balance.
Whether that's the right call depends on which problem you think is more urgent. Treasury seems to be landing somewhere in the middle: keep the lock, but add a last-resort emergency exit.
Timeline: What Happens Next
- 2026 (mid-year): Treasury begins stakeholder consultations — labour, industry, and public input
- 2026 (late): Draft proposals expected based on consultation outcomes
- 2027 Budget: Possible legislative changes announced
- 2027 (earliest): Implementation if approved
We'll update this page as the discussions progress. For now, the best thing you can do is understand your current retirement fund structure and plan accordingly.
Know Where You Stand
Use our retirement calculator to see your projected retirement income — and what withdrawing from your savings pot actually costs you long-term.
Try the Calculator →